Fri, 11 Jul 1997 03:13:20 -0400
Mr. Greenwald has alot of gentlemanly manners, diplomacy and even an
upfront no holds barred discussions with us employees at airport
sites. However you are right that these new directives [concerning
improved service as promised by the new United ad campaign] have to
filter down through management and supervision.
But you know what, we don't have such supervision anymore. All the
people who made United Airlines at one time a place where employees had
a "family" feel and people who really cared is long gone and it left
round about 1978. Alot of these longtime employees and caring people
have retired and left this airline. In the past year United has made
it mandatory that all or most employees attend a one-day session called
"Mission United". This was a useful "tool" but not long enough (one
day, 200 people in one session) primarily aimed at getting us to see
the benefits of being caring employees and happy to work for United and
make it the BEST airline etc, etc.
Oh, lets not forget we are employee/owners and we are allowed to be
"empowered" to make decisions towards the customer (not always having
to run to a supervisor to ask for permission); however, I have yet to
make a decision towards a customer (hopefully in his/her favor) that
wasn't "shot down" by my peers. I either get flack or negative
comments or I'm surrounded by fellow workers who can't make a decision
to save their life. Thank God I have the strength and mindset to
ignore them and make the decisions I have to make.
One letter in this
website concerning a lady with lupus who was traveling with a piece
of medical equipment and got no help or compassion, compounded by
insensitive comments, really got to me. The best point this writer
made was about flight attendants and employees who said it wasn't in
their contract to lift the equipment. What assholes - their parents
obviously never taught them about human compassion. I have been
brought down a peg myself after "losing it" with a customer or being
somewhat sarcastic when the next person that comes in front of me has
an infirmity or is elderly or somewhat lost or helpless - this is the
thing that should humble people toward others.
Here's an example of a longtime United Airlines employee (now retired)
who behaved differently. One time he observed a young girl with parents
traveling to Mayo Clinic (she was in the late stages of cancer). He
allowed her brothers on the plane to say their last goodbyes as they
were not traveling with her. The tears and emotions he said were
wrenching as it was obvious they would probably never see her again.
On another occasion, the same agent helped a Viet Vet with no legs and
only one arm be lifted into his seat. It was mandatory to tell the
gentleman that in the event of an emergency probably no one would be
able to aid him. (He did tell him quite diplomatically and the
gentleman understood completely).
The bottom line is THEY DON'T MAKE THEM LIKE THAT ANYMORE.
Mr. Cooperstock, I will try in my own small way to be a better customer
service person for United, your site has humbled me. I thank you and
probably will never have the pleasure of meeting you on a United
Airlines flight. Nevertheless, keep up the good work and I will look
at this site frequently.
Ed: And if United encouraged its other employees to adopt a similar
attitude to that described above, rather than continue to
treat its passengers with contempt, this web site would have no
reason to exist.
Wed, 9 Jul 1997 02:44:12 -0400
Thanks for a great web site. I am a United employee for 18 years and
although I honestly have to say I really enjoy working for United and
United has been good to me, I can see the reason for such complaints.
In my opinion the reason is the people they have hired in the past 5,
10, 15 years. Because of the "politically correct" and "diversity
accepting" society we all have to live in, they have hired many
incompetent, inarticulate, nonthinking, noneducated people who only
take up space and still think working for the airlines is so
glamorous. They are now on C and D level pay scales which equate to
about $6-$7 per hour with less than the same medical/travel benefits
those of us hired pre-1975.
What is so glamorous about this starting pay with no hope for maximum
for about 10 years. The turnover is in a constant state of flux - who
would stay at this rate of pay if they can't even enjoy the travel
benefits because they can't afford to go where they want to go? United
for the past 10 years has paid people peanuts so all they have is
"monkeys". Until they pay a decent starting wage and hire people who
are educated, experienced and able to speak English they will continue
to get the employees and service that these people have rightfully
complained about.
Wed, 11 Jun 1997 13:52:29 -0400
A coworker at UAL directed me to your Untied website. And I promptly
spent much to much time reading the horror stories. Although most of
it is negative, I can only hope more UAL employees read it and strive
to eliminate the need for it. As for me, I work baggage service at
[airport name] and if I can ever be of assistance in the lost luggage
field, feel free to e-mail me.
Wed, 04 Jun 1997 14:31:40 -0500
I just read the new letter about lost baggage. It does sound like a
clear UA error. I am surprised that we have not settled with these pax
yet. It sounds like her info just got lost by UA, not a very good
commentary, but it does happen. Unfortunately it seems like they are
starting from square one at this point.
Sun, 25 May 1997 11:38:01 -0400 (EDT)
I am an eight year flight attendant with United Airlines, and I found
your pages very interesting. I have to say that I think some very good
points are raised in the many letters I have read. These changes need
to start from the top and work their way down. No service that can't be
provided in a consistant manner should be offered. It's that simple.
Please keep writing management! Believe it not, we are in this thing
together!
Wed, 09 Apr 1997 21:29:26 -0500
I find it humorous that UAL has had lawyers write you as opposed to a
customer relations person. I know that all you want is an
acknowledgement of the problem. I bet it would have been easier for UAL
to admit the problem than to get lawyers involved.
Tue, 04 Feb 1997 14:45:08 -0800
I am a [six year] UA employee. The instances that I have read about
are in many ways inexcusable, at least the service given to passengers
was.